Gave it a try and was not convinced. Lay out is great, but skipping from page to page was really slow and the results were shown in an order that made less sense to me than Google's.
Bustan_A, Jul 28, 08 22:07

Tried it also. Nice design, but some place for improvement. Speed is o.k. Listing of pages is poor. Search result is poor, too. Server problems appeared (21.43).
Volkes, Jul 28, 08 23:44

Ok.. I've now tried it and it's kinda 'Cuil' (Cool):cool:.  i did a search for myself and it put me on ahead of my sisterens who are a scientist, researcher, professor and photographer (someone i've been in contact with before). vs. Google putting me in 4th place. :angry:
YouMeCo, Jul 29, 08 02:11

Pretty cool indeed.

Most of us use Google for all searches, and it's easy to miss the fact that there are alot of companies out there trying to create the 'next generation' search engine, which will (hopefully) be even better than Google.

Here is some more info about this new search engine (Cuil) from TechCrunch:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/27/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isnt-the-whole-story/

Oded
SiteAdmin Oded, Jul 29, 08 10:35

Very nice... I'll recheck in five years.
Casuistik, Jul 29, 08 11:57

Thanks for the tip!



Just tried Cuil, and I like the presentation of the results.



I noted that it does not cluster results, you can get several pages from the same site in the result display.



Cheers,



Bert



PS We are running a vertical search engine specialised in human rights: www.hurisearch.org
kassari, Jul 29, 08 12:08