Re: Woman's potato fall 'not restaurant’s fault': court
Post 5
Zonker: Alan, are you saying that if a customer spills some oil (for their salad) as they walk back to their seat, the restaurant has no responsibily to clean it up?
Alan: No, I did not say, that the restaurant has no responibility to clean up food. Just that in this non-perfect world we live in, we should not be able to sue a restaurant, because someone slips on food on the floor.
Zonker: And for the rest of the evening, all clients must be aware of that oil spill and walk around it? So, by the end of the evening, there might be an entire meal's worth of food on the floor, and we're just to navigate it like a downhill slalom?
Alan: No, there are other reasons besides people slipping on food, that food should not stay on the ground for a whole evening.
Zonker: When I return to the buffet, I usually take my plate with me. So, that would actually obstruct my view of the floor, which I concede I don't actually look at very often. Not to mention, I might be walking with my dining partner and thus, may not be focusing on where I walk. I do have an expectation that the floor tiles will all be there, and no holes or such in them, that I might fall in or stumble over.
Alan: The rule is reasonable expectation. If you eat a piece of bread and you find a nail in it, you should be able to sue the producer. But if you eat a bread with nuts, there is alaways a slight chance, that there might be some nut shells in it.
Alan: I am not responding to you over the top statement as I am not sure, what you mean exaclty.
Zonker: About this infernal potato, how long was it there? Did it fall moments before the lady slipped on it? Or was it there for an hour, being stepped on, squished and more until finally it was a nice slippery patch that someone was doomed to step on? If it just fell, the lady had an unfortunate accident for which no one is to blame. (Well, the person who dropped it and didn't pick it up, maybe.) In the second case, yes, I would blame the restaurant.
Alan: I do think that at least some of those points were taken into consideration. If she could have proven, that the potatoe was there for hours, she might have a point.
Zonker: I don't blame the restaurant without consideration. I don't blame the lady without consideration. But I don't think that one can make blanket statements about whether or not this case was justified or not.
Alan: Again, I was talking about this case and similiar cases (Engadiner Nusstorte with parts of nut shells). I strongly dislike her position aobut there should have been a note. Like you see on some products like: These nuts contain nuts. People who eat nuts just because they didn't find a note saying these nuts (which the people eating them recognized as nuts but ate anyway), they shold get the Darwin Award. Same as people who put their new Iphone into to microwave to load them, just because someone made an add on the internet...
epicure: well, after reflection, we don't know to whom the potato belonged. if it belonged to the lady, and it fell out of her shopping bag let's say, it may very well be her own responsibility. ( she at least got mashed potatos as a consequence!) but if it was perhaps a waiter who dropped it from the tray etc, then it is too obvious that the responsibilty remains with the restaurant. as you say alan
Alan: If she had won the case, what would hinder anyone dropping a potatoe and slipping on it, just to sue the restaurant?
epicure: therefore the restaurant cannot blame the woman for the restaurant's negligence and lack of responsibilty.
Alan: This was not part of the court case, so whatever.