Login or Sign Up
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Global Forums > General > In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
 
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Solzhenitsyn passed away. While he lived, he was one of most thought provoking personalties amongst us. His vision for Russia was as unusual as his comprehension was deep. He saw life in its extremes. Isolated yet unafraid, he continued to write, reveal the truth, as he suffered in prison camps.

One can write a lot about him, his stories and novels. One can debate his recent speeches. This is not the place or time for that. In his passing, it is inspiring to reflect on his courage, his nobel perception of Art, and this extraordinary artist from Russia.

Here is a beautiful excerpt from the 1970 Nobel lecture, which Solzhenitsyn prepared but could not deliver because he was not allowed to travel...

    Just as that puzzled savage who has picked up - a strange cast-up from the ocean? - something unearthed from the sands? - or an obscure object fallen down from the sky? - intricate in curves, it gleams first dully and then with a bright thrust of light. Just as he turns it this way and that, turns it over, trying to discover what to do with it, trying to discover some mundane function within his own grasp, never dreaming of its higher function.

So also we, holding Art in our hands, confidently consider ourselves to be its masters; boldly we direct it, we renew, reform and manifest it; we sell it for money, use it to please those in power; turn to it at one moment for amusement - right down to popular songs and night-clubs, and at another - grabbing the nearest weapon, cork or cudgel - for the passing needs of politics and for narrow-minded social ends. But art is not defiled by our efforts, neither does it thereby depart from its true nature, but on each occasion and in each application it gives to us a part of its secret inner light.

But shall we ever grasp the whole of that light? Who will dare to say that he has DEFINED Art, enumerated all its facets? Perhaps once upon a time someone understood and told us, but we could not remain satisfied with that for long; we listened, and neglected, and threw it out there and then, hurrying as always to exchange even the very best - if only for something new! And when we are told again the old truth, we shall not even remember that we once possessed it.

One artist sees himself as the creator of an independent spiritual world; he hoists onto his shoulders the task of creating this world, of peopling it and of bearing the all-embracing responsibility for it; but he crumples beneath it, for a mortal genius is not capable of bearing such a burden. Just as man in general, having declared himself the centre of existence, has not succeeded in creating a balanced spiritual system. And if misfortune overtakes him, he casts the blame upon the age-long disharmony of the world, upon the complexity of today's ruptured soul, or upon the stupidity of the public.

Another artist, recognizing a higher power above, gladly works as a humble apprentice beneath God's heaven; then, however, his responsbility for everything that is written or drawn, for the souls which perceive his work, is more exacting than ever. But, in return, it is not he who has created this world, not he who directs it, there is no doubt as to its foundations; the artist has merely to be more keenly aware than others of the harmony of the world, of the beauty and ugliness of the human contribution to it, and to communicate this acutely to his fellow-men. And in misfortune, and even at the depths of existence - in destitution, in prison, in sickness - his sense of stable harmony never deserts him.

But all the irrationality of art, its dazzling turns, its unpredictable discoveries, its shattering influence on human beings - they are too full of magic to be exhausted by this artist's vision of the world, by his artistic conception or by the work of his unworthy fingers.

Archeologists have not discovered stages of human existence so early that they were without art. Right back in the early morning twilights of mankind we received it from Hands which we were too slow to discern. And we were too slow to ask: FOR WHAT PURPOSE have we been given this gift? What are we to do with it?

And they were mistaken, and will always be mistaken, who prophesy that art will disintegrate, that it will outlive its forms and die. It is we who shall die - art will remain. And shall we comprehend, even on the day of our destruction, all its facets and all its possibilities?

Not everything assumes a name. Some things lead beyond words. Art inflames even a frozen, darkened soul to a high spiritual experience.

[ ]

The rest of this Nobel lecture is available here.

The text you are quoting:
Solzhenitsyn passed away. While he lived, he was one of most thought provoking personalties amongst us. His vision for Russia was as unusual as his comprehension was deep. He saw life in its extremes. Isolated yet unafraid, he continued to write, reveal the truth, as he suffered in prison camps.

One can write a lot about him, his stories and novels. One can debate his recent speeches. This is not the place or time for that. In his passing, it is inspiring to reflect on his courage, his nobel perception of Art, and this extraordinary artist from Russia.

Here is a beautiful excerpt from the 1970 Nobel lecture, which Solzhenitsyn prepared but could not deliver because he was not allowed to travel...

    Just as that puzzled savage who has picked up - a strange cast-up from the ocean? - something unearthed from the sands? - or an obscure object fallen down from the sky? - intricate in curves, it gleams first dully and then with a bright thrust of light. Just as he turns it this way and that, turns it over, trying to discover what to do with it, trying to discover some mundane function within his own grasp, never dreaming of its higher function.

So also we, holding Art in our hands, confidently consider ourselves to be its masters; boldly we direct it, we renew, reform and manifest it; we sell it for money, use it to please those in power; turn to it at one moment for amusement - right down to popular songs and night-clubs, and at another - grabbing the nearest weapon, cork or cudgel - for the passing needs of politics and for narrow-minded social ends. But art is not defiled by our efforts, neither does it thereby depart from its true nature, but on each occasion and in each application it gives to us a part of its secret inner light.

But shall we ever grasp the whole of that light? Who will dare to say that he has DEFINED Art, enumerated all its facets? Perhaps once upon a time someone understood and told us, but we could not remain satisfied with that for long; we listened, and neglected, and threw it out there and then, hurrying as always to exchange even the very best - if only for something new! And when we are told again the old truth, we shall not even remember that we once possessed it.

One artist sees himself as the creator of an independent spiritual world; he hoists onto his shoulders the task of creating this world, of peopling it and of bearing the all-embracing responsibility for it; but he crumples beneath it, for a mortal genius is not capable of bearing such a burden. Just as man in general, having declared himself the centre of existence, has not succeeded in creating a balanced spiritual system. And if misfortune overtakes him, he casts the blame upon the age-long disharmony of the world, upon the complexity of today's ruptured soul, or upon the stupidity of the public.

Another artist, recognizing a higher power above, gladly works as a humble apprentice beneath God's heaven; then, however, his responsbility for everything that is written or drawn, for the souls which perceive his work, is more exacting than ever. But, in return, it is not he who has created this world, not he who directs it, there is no doubt as to its foundations; the artist has merely to be more keenly aware than others of the harmony of the world, of the beauty and ugliness of the human contribution to it, and to communicate this acutely to his fellow-men. And in misfortune, and even at the depths of existence - in destitution, in prison, in sickness - his sense of stable harmony never deserts him.

But all the irrationality of art, its dazzling turns, its unpredictable discoveries, its shattering influence on human beings - they are too full of magic to be exhausted by this artist's vision of the world, by his artistic conception or by the work of his unworthy fingers.

Archeologists have not discovered stages of human existence so early that they were without art. Right back in the early morning twilights of mankind we received it from Hands which we were too slow to discern. And we were too slow to ask: FOR WHAT PURPOSE have we been given this gift? What are we to do with it?

And they were mistaken, and will always be mistaken, who prophesy that art will disintegrate, that it will outlive its forms and die. It is we who shall die - art will remain. And shall we comprehend, even on the day of our destruction, all its facets and all its possibilities?

Not everything assumes a name. Some things lead beyond words. Art inflames even a frozen, darkened soul to a high spiritual experience.

[ ]

The rest of this Nobel lecture is available here.
coloradoAug 4, 2008 @ 23:06

Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
 
16 Replies | 1480 Views      |  Send to friend
 
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 1
very interesting interview is available on

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,496003,00.html
The text you are quoting:
very interesting interview is available on

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,496003,00.html
oyuna, Aug 5, 2008 @ 00:03
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 2
[quote]very interesting interview is available on
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,496003,00.html[/quote]

Thanks Oyuna, for the link....its really wonderful..I liked it....If u have some other material / links..let me know....take care...arvind

The text you are quoting:
[quote]very interesting interview is available on
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,496003,00.html[/quote]

Thanks Oyuna, for the link....its really wonderful..I liked it....If u have some other material / links..let me know....take care...arvind
aarbind, Aug 5, 2008 @ 00:42

Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 3
aarbind (04/08/2008)

some other material / links..let me know....take care...arvind

[/quote]

There are two other Solzhenitsyn classics which are quite thought provoking. They are quite old, you might have seen them, but here they are just in case.

The first one is the Harvard speech given about 30 years ago. It is long (get a glass of wine or beer or whatever before you start!), it is thought provoking and it is controversial. One can listen to it, or read it. Before one does so, it is worthwhile to visit the context. He was speaking in the world of 1970s, most of us were too young (or yet to be born!) to comprehend its gravity... vietnam and other regional wars were fresh in everyone's mind, Nixon resignation, the oil shock and crisis, cold war, inflation, nuclear arms race, violence and dictatorships in Spanish-speaking world, socialism and other communist variants were brutally pursued in many countries - China, India, etc etc. In those times, Solzhenitsyn had this to say.

The second one is even older. It is not a speech, it was a letter he wrote which triggered his arrest and exile from Soviet Union. It is short. It is simple yet profound in its hope and courage. It was published in The Washington Post. You can read it here.

The text you are quoting:
aarbind (04/08/2008)

some other material / links..let me know....take care...arvind

[/quote]

There are two other Solzhenitsyn classics which are quite thought provoking. They are quite old, you might have seen them, but here they are just in case.

The first one is the Harvard speech given about 30 years ago. It is long (get a glass of wine or beer or whatever before you start!), it is thought provoking and it is controversial. One can listen to it, or read it. Before one does so, it is worthwhile to visit the context. He was speaking in the world of 1970s, most of us were too young (or yet to be born!) to comprehend its gravity... vietnam and other regional wars were fresh in everyone's mind, Nixon resignation, the oil shock and crisis, cold war, inflation, nuclear arms race, violence and dictatorships in Spanish-speaking world, socialism and other communist variants were brutally pursued in many countries - China, India, etc etc. In those times, Solzhenitsyn had this to say.

The second one is even older. It is not a speech, it was a letter he wrote which triggered his arrest and exile from Soviet Union. It is short. It is simple yet profound in its hope and courage. It was published in The Washington Post. You can read it here.
colorado, Aug 6, 2008 @ 03:05

Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 4
Today's copy of The Wall Street Journal published a good feature article on Solzhenitsyn. You can read it here.

I like the way that article builds on The Oak and the Calf... what a beautiful and hope-inspiring memoir. Another great work from someone in Solzhenitsyn's generation was by Friedrich von Hayek, who in his 1944 book "The Road to Serfdom" predicted what Solzhenitsyn experienced years later. Both authors offer insightful arguments on why we should seek and protect economic, political and social freedoms.

I digress. Enjoy that link from WSJ.

The text you are quoting:
Today's copy of The Wall Street Journal published a good feature article on Solzhenitsyn. You can read it here.

I like the way that article builds on The Oak and the Calf... what a beautiful and hope-inspiring memoir. Another great work from someone in Solzhenitsyn's generation was by Friedrich von Hayek, who in his 1944 book "The Road to Serfdom" predicted what Solzhenitsyn experienced years later. Both authors offer insightful arguments on why we should seek and protect economic, political and social freedoms.

I digress. Enjoy that link from WSJ.
colorado, Aug 9, 2008 @ 23:44

Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 5
Is an article about him, Russia's intelligentsia, and commentary on politics, people and press... in this week's Economist too
The text you are quoting:
Is an article about him, Russia's intelligentsia, and commentary on politics, people and press... in this week's Economist too
SimSim, Aug 10, 2008 @ 13:56
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 6
isa413
is it true she was denounced by Solzhenitsyn's wife ??
[\quote]

Should we bother ourselves with these questions?

I do not know whether what you claim about Solzhenitsyn personal life is true, or important. I do not know the history of his or his wife's relationships. New York Times and a few other sources have a different version of the claims you make (they also discuss the controversy around Solzhenitsyn). 

Same goes for Gandhi. The last time I heard the story you tell, I was told that the penicillin incident happened when Colonial British had his wife and him in jail for encouraging civil and non-violent disobedience; the British government shipped the medicine to avoid a public relations problem; etc Gandhi then made one of his many mistakes etc. I have not cared much to discover or verify details of that incident or many other strange details about Gandhi. Or for that matter, strange details on the lives of Isaac Newton, Einstein, Picasso, Cezanne, Mozart, Beethoven, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Calvin, Goethe, Voltaire, Hume, Darwin, Shackleton, Freud, Pythagoras, Socrates, Cicero, Sheba, Gibran, Han Shan, others.

Why bother?

My view is that it is never the man or woman that is important. What is important are the insights and the truths they championed and shared with us. So we can question ourselves. So we can learn. So we can guide our present and future with what they discovered or championed.

I am not convinced that we should bother about what someone's spouse said to another person, and what that person then did, and what happened next to the spouse's friend's acquaintance, and so on.

The text you are quoting:
isa413
is it true she was denounced by Solzhenitsyn's wife ??
[\quote]

Should we bother ourselves with these questions?

I do not know whether what you claim about Solzhenitsyn personal life is true, or important. I do not know the history of his or his wife's relationships. New York Times and a few other sources have a different version of the claims you make (they also discuss the controversy around Solzhenitsyn). 

Same goes for Gandhi. The last time I heard the story you tell, I was told that the penicillin incident happened when Colonial British had his wife and him in jail for encouraging civil and non-violent disobedience; the British government shipped the medicine to avoid a public relations problem; etc Gandhi then made one of his many mistakes etc. I have not cared much to discover or verify details of that incident or many other strange details about Gandhi. Or for that matter, strange details on the lives of Isaac Newton, Einstein, Picasso, Cezanne, Mozart, Beethoven, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Calvin, Goethe, Voltaire, Hume, Darwin, Shackleton, Freud, Pythagoras, Socrates, Cicero, Sheba, Gibran, Han Shan, others.

Why bother?

My view is that it is never the man or woman that is important. What is important are the insights and the truths they championed and shared with us. So we can question ourselves. So we can learn. So we can guide our present and future with what they discovered or championed.

I am not convinced that we should bother about what someone's spouse said to another person, and what that person then did, and what happened next to the spouse's friend's acquaintance, and so on.
colorado, Aug 11, 2008 @ 07:56

Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 7
Hi Isac,

I am agree with you that Gandhi accepted the alien medicine for himself and refused to accept the same for his wife 'Kasturba gandhi'.

I did a lot of study on gandhi and I can confirm your statement about gandhi. Thanks a lot for posting such interesting about the great people like Gandhi.

Take care.

The text you are quoting:
Hi Isac,

I am agree with you that Gandhi accepted the alien medicine for himself and refused to accept the same for his wife 'Kasturba gandhi'.

I did a lot of study on gandhi and I can confirm your statement about gandhi. Thanks a lot for posting such interesting about the great people like Gandhi.

Take care.
aarbind, Aug 11, 2008 @ 11:32

Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 8
Dear Isac, You are right. You were not in man hated mood...its perfect justice. My philopsphy is if you cant do something ..then dont expect others / spouse to do it.

If you are doing something then youu dont have any right to ban others /spouse. I really liked your views and I appreciate it.

I am doing my research on this topic..so I would love to get more ideas from ur side. You can send me mail on my email i.d [email protected]

hope to hear u soon...Arvind

The text you are quoting:
Dear Isac, You are right. You were not in man hated mood...its perfect justice. My philopsphy is if you cant do something ..then dont expect others / spouse to do it.

If you are doing something then youu dont have any right to ban others /spouse. I really liked your views and I appreciate it.

I am doing my research on this topic..so I would love to get more ideas from ur side. You can send me mail on my email i.d [email protected]

hope to hear u soon...Arvind
aarbind, Aug 11, 2008 @ 15:55

Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 9
bravo, anon.
The text you are quoting:
bravo, anon.
graham1, Mar 3, 2009 @ 01:13
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: In Memorium - Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
Post 10
bravo, anon.
The text you are quoting:
bravo, anon.
graham1, Mar 3, 2009 @ 01:15
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
16 Replies | 1480 Views      |  Send to friend
 
 
 
Feedback Form