Login or Sign Up
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Global Forums > General > NY Times: New Hacking Tools Pose Bigger Threats to Wi-Fi Users
 
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
NY Times: New Hacking Tools Pose Bigger Threats to Wi-Fi Users

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/technology/personaltech/17basics.html?src=me&ref=homepage

Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
 
3 Replies | 812 Views      |  Send to friend
 
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: NY Times: New Hacking Tools Pose Bigger Threats to Wi-Fi Users
Post 1

Does anyone know whether this also means emails received over mobile phones?  Thanks for any replies.

The text you are quoting:

Does anyone know whether this also means emails received over mobile phones?  Thanks for any replies.


Translator, Feb 20, 2011 @ 22:40
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: NY Times: New Hacking Tools Pose Bigger Threats to Wi-Fi Users
Post 2

Yes, emails sent and received via mobile phone can be intercepted unless you use either


1) an encrypted (WPA) Wi-Fi connection, or


2) an encrypted protocol, such as HTTPS (for webmail) or IMAP/SMTP over SSL (for mailclients), or


3) the 3G/HSDPA cellular network instead of the Wi-Fi.


We discussed of this here.


However, note that Firesheep is rather aimed at intercepting passwords.  To capture the contents of whole email messages, the hacker has to run a more advanced sniffer program (e.g. Wireshark).


 

The text you are quoting:

Yes, emails sent and received via mobile phone can be intercepted unless you use either


1) an encrypted (WPA) Wi-Fi connection, or


2) an encrypted protocol, such as HTTPS (for webmail) or IMAP/SMTP over SSL (for mailclients), or


3) the 3G/HSDPA cellular network instead of the Wi-Fi.


We discussed of this here.


However, note that Firesheep is rather aimed at intercepting passwords.  To capture the contents of whole email messages, the hacker has to run a more advanced sniffer program (e.g. Wireshark).


 


TheOmegaMan, Feb 20, 2011 @ 23:32
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: NY Times: New Hacking Tools Pose Bigger Threats to Wi-Fi Users
Post 3

By the way, email messages are by no means secure.  They travel through the Internet in plaintext, and could possibly be read on any router from your computer to the final destination.  You should not use them to send any information you wouldn't write on a postcard. 


If you really need to send sensitive data, consider using PGP or Enigmail.  These tools encrypt your email messages end-to-end, so that they are protected against any sniffing attack, even on an unsecured wireless connection.  

The text you are quoting:

By the way, email messages are by no means secure.  They travel through the Internet in plaintext, and could possibly be read on any router from your computer to the final destination.  You should not use them to send any information you wouldn't write on a postcard. 


If you really need to send sensitive data, consider using PGP or Enigmail.  These tools encrypt your email messages end-to-end, so that they are protected against any sniffing attack, even on an unsecured wireless connection.  


TheOmegaMan, Feb 21, 2011 @ 08:10
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
3 Replies | 812 Views      |  Send to friend
 
 
 
Feedback Form