Login or Sign Up
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Global Forums > General > Trying to ascertain...
 
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Trying to ascertain...

All,

I have hit a stumbling block in my research and must beg for your help. I desperately need to know the length of a piece of string. I... I just can't bend my mind around the problem.

I have created the following doodle poll to try and help me figure it out: http://doodle.com/f5krz4ktrtmwenmr


 


Thanks for your help.

The text you are quoting:

All,

I have hit a stumbling block in my research and must beg for your help. I desperately need to know the length of a piece of string. I... I just can't bend my mind around the problem.

I have created the following doodle poll to try and help me figure it out: http://doodle.com/f5krz4ktrtmwenmr


 


Thanks for your help.


hayesNov 12, 2009 @ 16:32
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
 
19 Replies | 1133 Views      |  Send to friend
 
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 1

Probably the number of centimeters from one end to the other.


But might also be the number of inches from one end to the middle times 4 divided by 2.


O

The text you are quoting:

Probably the number of centimeters from one end to the other.


But might also be the number of inches from one end to the middle times 4 divided by 2.


O


SiteAdmin Oded, Nov 12, 2009 @ 16:57
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 2

A perfect illustration of the problem: one post with two answers.


It's exactly this problem that I'm trying to solve.

The text you are quoting:

A perfect illustration of the problem: one post with two answers.


It's exactly this problem that I'm trying to solve.


hayes, Nov 12, 2009 @ 17:04
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 3

Ask some Cern people - they're supposed to be pretty smart.


 

The text you are quoting:

Ask some Cern people - they're supposed to be pretty smart.


 


SiteAdmin Oded, Nov 12, 2009 @ 17:20
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 4

Ask some Cern people - they're supposed to be pretty smart.

 


Nov 12, 09 17:20

Ahh, now I see what you were getting at: in giving me two answes you were actually giving me one (leave it!). It's like all answers are permitted until you make an observation. And thereby the reference to quantum and particle physics. Or the wave and particle nature of light and matter. Everything together. All answers, yet only one. You're pretty good, SiteAdmin, do you work at CERN?

The text you are quoting:

Ahh, now I see what you were getting at: in giving me two answes you were actually giving me one (leave it!). It's like all answers are permitted until you make an observation. And thereby the reference to quantum and particle physics. Or the wave and particle nature of light and matter. Everything together. All answers, yet only one. You're pretty good, SiteAdmin, do you work at CERN?


hayes, Nov 12, 2009 @ 17:24
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 5

Actualy, I'm a Supermodel, but I'm one of those smart supermodels you read about but never actualy meet.


And strangely enough, I did my thesis on string measurements...

The text you are quoting:

Actualy, I'm a Supermodel, but I'm one of those smart supermodels you read about but never actualy meet.


And strangely enough, I did my thesis on string measurements...


SiteAdmin Oded, Nov 12, 2009 @ 17:34
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 6

Jan 1, 70 01:00

A closed loop has no beginning and no end. Once you have started, how do you stop?

The text you are quoting:

A closed loop has no beginning and no end. Once you have started, how do you stop?


hayes, Nov 12, 2009 @ 17:54
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 7

All,

I have hit a stumbling block in my research and must beg for your help. I desperately need to know the length of a piece of string. I... I just can't bend my mind around the problem.

I have created the following doodle poll to try and help me figure it out: http://doodle.com/f5krz4ktrtmwenmr

 

Thanks for your help.


Nov 12, 09 16:32

It's as long or as short as you want it to be ;)

The text you are quoting:

It's as long or as short as you want it to be ;)


DJ_Symcard, Nov 12, 2009 @ 18:21
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 8

It's as long or as short as you want it to be ;)


Nov 12, 09 18:21

That used to be my pickup line when I was single :-)

The text you are quoting:

That used to be my pickup line when I was single :-)


SiteAdmin Oded, Nov 12, 2009 @ 18:24
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 9

come on hayes, haven't you studied string theory? just ggogle it.lol


even better; how many rolls of toilet paper do you need to go from the earth to the moon?


 


answer: read tomorrow's forum

The text you are quoting:

come on hayes, haven't you studied string theory? just ggogle it.lol


even better; how many rolls of toilet paper do you need to go from the earth to the moon?


 


answer: read tomorrow's forum


epicure, Nov 12, 2009 @ 18:27
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 10

come on hayes, haven't you studied string theory? just ggogle it.lol

even better; how many rolls of toilet paper do you need to go from the earth to the moon?

 

answer: read tomorrow's forum


Nov 12, 09 18:27

one



The text you are quoting:

one


hayes, Nov 12, 2009 @ 18:33
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 11

That used to be my pickup line when I was single :-)


Nov 12, 09 18:24

I guess it worked then!!

The text you are quoting:

I guess it worked then!!


Maria_, Nov 12, 2009 @ 19:27
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 12

Is it the ring/set theory we learnt in Topology classes os something else dealing with counting?

The text you are quoting:

Is it the ring/set theory we learnt in Topology classes os something else dealing with counting?


Gichana, Nov 12, 2009 @ 20:04
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 13

What are you playing at Hayes - the right answer is not an option there in the Doodle!?


 


I would venture to say that the string is not relevant to this question, it's the piece we should be focusing on. A piece of string, a piece of salami and a piece of asteroid would all occupy the same dimensions as denoted by the nature of their existence as a piece.


 


The definitive piece (a bit like standard yard set into one of the walls of Trafalgar Square) is of course Dirty Harry's Smith and Wesson 657 .41 Magnum. This has a length of a clean 12 inches.


 


But 12" is not to be found in Hayes' Doodle, what's going on?

The text you are quoting:

What are you playing at Hayes - the right answer is not an option there in the Doodle!?


 


I would venture to say that the string is not relevant to this question, it's the piece we should be focusing on. A piece of string, a piece of salami and a piece of asteroid would all occupy the same dimensions as denoted by the nature of their existence as a piece.


 


The definitive piece (a bit like standard yard set into one of the walls of Trafalgar Square) is of course Dirty Harry's Smith and Wesson 657 .41 Magnum. This has a length of a clean 12 inches.


 


But 12" is not to be found in Hayes' Doodle, what's going on?


rich_t, Nov 13, 2009 @ 09:57
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 14

well, biscuit chafe, the ? in the !? that delimits your first sentence shows you yourself are a little doubtful about your venture. Even the canonical piece of gruyere and piece of appenzeller do not occupy the same dimension. for clarity, a you may want to consider the length of a peace of string.

The text you are quoting:

well, biscuit chafe, the ? in the !? that delimits your first sentence shows you yourself are a little doubtful about your venture. Even the canonical piece of gruyere and piece of appenzeller do not occupy the same dimension. for clarity, a you may want to consider the length of a peace of string.


hayes, Nov 13, 2009 @ 11:35
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 15

Twice as long as half it's length. 


Do I win anything?!?!  Smile haha!

The text you are quoting:

Twice as long as half it's length. 


Do I win anything?!?!  Smile haha!


magenta, Nov 15, 2009 @ 09:27
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 16

how many rolls of toilet paper would it take to go from the earth to the moon?


 


ans: 1......if it´s long enough!

The text you are quoting:

how many rolls of toilet paper would it take to go from the earth to the moon?


 


ans: 1......if it´s long enough!


epicure, Nov 15, 2009 @ 09:36
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 17

This was community-based assistnace in my research, not a competition. I don't have budget to cover prizes.


But OK, since you did so well, you can have a prize. You win the amount of wood that a woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. I'll start a new thread to figure out just how much wood that is.

The text you are quoting:

This was community-based assistnace in my research, not a competition. I don't have budget to cover prizes.


But OK, since you did so well, you can have a prize. You win the amount of wood that a woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. I'll start a new thread to figure out just how much wood that is.


hayes, Nov 15, 2009 @ 12:45
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 18

Jan 1, 70 01:00

Sure what they find may look like the Higgs, quack like the Higgs and waddle like the Higgs, but it'll exhibit a slightly different spin. It may well be the Hayes boson; irritating all the other particles by giving them mass. The poor scientists will probably call it the Higgs anyway in the press-releases just to save face, but you know what it will really be.


I've said before that professionally I hope they don't find the Higgs or the LSP, but it's also a little personal.

The text you are quoting:

Sure what they find may look like the Higgs, quack like the Higgs and waddle like the Higgs, but it'll exhibit a slightly different spin. It may well be the Hayes boson; irritating all the other particles by giving them mass. The poor scientists will probably call it the Higgs anyway in the press-releases just to save face, but you know what it will really be.


I've said before that professionally I hope they don't find the Higgs or the LSP, but it's also a little personal.


hayes, Nov 15, 2009 @ 14:59
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
Only members can see photos
Only members can see names and photos
Re: Trying to ascertain...
Post 19

Horizon: How Long is a Piece...
BBC2
Alan Davies attempts to answer the proverbial question: how long is a piece of string? But what appears to be a simple task soon turns into a mind-bending voyage of discovery where nothing is as it seems. An encounter with leading mathematician Marcus du Sautoy reveals that Alan's short length of string may in fact be infinitely long. When Alan attempts to measure his string at the atomic scale, objects appear in many places at once, and reality itself appears to be an illusion. AD SUB
Factual Science
Today on BBC2 from 9:00pm to 10:00pm

The text you are quoting:

Horizon: How Long is a Piece...
BBC2
Alan Davies attempts to answer the proverbial question: how long is a piece of string? But what appears to be a simple task soon turns into a mind-bending voyage of discovery where nothing is as it seems. An encounter with leading mathematician Marcus du Sautoy reveals that Alan's short length of string may in fact be infinitely long. When Alan attempts to measure his string at the atomic scale, objects appear in many places at once, and reality itself appears to be an illusion. AD SUB
Factual Science
Today on BBC2 from 9:00pm to 10:00pm


epicure, Nov 17, 2009 @ 17:23
Your Reply:
Reply  Reply With Quote  Thank Poster
! Report to Admin
19 Replies | 1133 Views      |  Send to friend
 
 
 
Feedback Form