Thanks Bustan!
Global Forums > General > glocals on Wikipedia
Only members can see names and photos
glocals on Wikipedia
Apr 14, 2008 @ 01:28
Check out this Wikipedia article about glocals, writeen by glocals member Bustan_a, who's a Wikipedia Editor.
The text you are quoting:
Check out this Wikipedia article about glocals, writeen by glocals member Bustan_a, who's a Wikipedia Editor.
Thanks Bustan!
Nir OfekApr 14, 2008 @ 01:28
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: glocals on Wikipedia
Post 1
Apr 14, 2008 @ 11:00
[quote]Check out this Wikipedia article about glocals, writeen by glocals member Bustan_a, who's a Wikipedia Editor.
Thanks Bustan![/quote]
Look an article from the future:
^ Cormon P., “Glocals, le site Internet qui fait aimer la Suisse aux expatriés”, Entreprise romande, December 21, 2008
:)
Maybe I should edit that portion but I think it is funny.
Thanks Bustan![/quote]
Look an article from the future:
^ Cormon P., “Glocals, le site Internet qui fait aimer la Suisse aux expatriés”, Entreprise romande, December 21, 2008
:)
Maybe I should edit that portion but I think it is funny.
The text you are quoting:
[quote]Check out this Wikipedia article about glocals, writeen by glocals member Bustan_a, who's a Wikipedia Editor.
Thanks Bustan![/quote]
Look an article from the future:
^ Cormon P., “Glocals, le site Internet qui fait aimer la Suisse aux expatriés”, Entreprise romande, December 21, 2008
:)
Maybe I should edit that portion but I think it is funny.
StephenSQL, Apr 14, 2008 @ 11:00
Thanks Bustan![/quote]
Look an article from the future:
^ Cormon P., “Glocals, le site Internet qui fait aimer la Suisse aux expatriés”, Entreprise romande, December 21, 2008
:)
Maybe I should edit that portion but I think it is funny.
StephenSQL, Apr 14, 2008 @ 11:00
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: glocals on Wikipedia
Post 2
Apr 14, 2008 @ 11:05
woops...thanks Stephen. Maybe it's on purpose, to show that glocals is here to stay for now AND the future...(-:
Pierre: OK with you if I change the date to '2007'?
The text you are quoting:
woops...thanks Stephen. Maybe it's on purpose, to show that glocals is here to stay for now AND the future...(-:
Pierre: OK with you if I change the date to '2007'?
Nir Ofek, Apr 14, 2008 @ 11:05
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: glocals on Wikipedia
Post 3
Apr 14, 2008 @ 14:40
A good fairy did it for me...
Only members can see names and photos
Re: glocals on Wikipedia
Post 4
Apr 14, 2008 @ 15:43
Corrected, thanks.
Only members can see names and photos
Re: glocals on Wikipedia
Post 5
Apr 14, 2008 @ 21:52
Ay ay ay, I just received a notice that the article on glocals has been deleted. :crying: The reason is: "it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia".
I am a bit surprised as, if I read the guidelines stating the conditions under which a website can be included on Wikipedia, glocals seems to fit perfectly. :ermm:
The problem is maybe that I indicated only the references which give interesting info, which are not necessarily the most prestigious ones. I will give it another try adding more media references, like the TSR programm of last night.
Any advice from a more experienced Wikipedia contributor welcome.
The text you are quoting:
Ay ay ay, I just received a notice that the article on glocals has been deleted. :crying: The reason is: "it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia".
I am a bit surprised as, if I read the guidelines stating the conditions under which a website can be included on Wikipedia, glocals seems to fit perfectly. :ermm:
The problem is maybe that I indicated only the references which give interesting info, which are not necessarily the most prestigious ones. I will give it another try adding more media references, like the TSR programm of last night.
Any advice from a more experienced Wikipedia contributor welcome.
Bustan_A, Apr 14, 2008 @ 21:52
Your Reply:
