What it says up there ^^^
Can anyone recommend me a someone working in past-life regression and capable of performing the necessary hypnosis? Someone professional, mind you, I'm talking doctor here. Qualifications, certificates and all that shizzle. No hacks, cowboys, or bike mechanics with a watch chain and a few free hours.
In the Geneva area.
And English-speaking.
Oh, and in case you were wondering: I'm 100% serious.
Forums in Geneva > Geneva > ??? Past life regression hypnotist (Geneva) ???
Only members can see names and photos
??? Past life regression hypnotist (Geneva) ???
Sep 11, 2008 @ 00:34
The text you are quoting:
What it says up there ^^^
Can anyone recommend me a someone working in past-life regression and capable of performing the necessary hypnosis? Someone professional, mind you, I'm talking doctor here. Qualifications, certificates and all that shizzle. No hacks, cowboys, or bike mechanics with a watch chain and a few free hours.
In the Geneva area.
And English-speaking.
Oh, and in case you were wondering: I'm 100% serious.
hayesSep 11, 2008 @ 00:34
Can anyone recommend me a someone working in past-life regression and capable of performing the necessary hypnosis? Someone professional, mind you, I'm talking doctor here. Qualifications, certificates and all that shizzle. No hacks, cowboys, or bike mechanics with a watch chain and a few free hours.
In the Geneva area.
And English-speaking.
Oh, and in case you were wondering: I'm 100% serious.
hayesSep 11, 2008 @ 00:34
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: ??? Past life regression hypnotist (Geneva) ???
Post 1
Sep 11, 2008 @ 00:39
OK, at least with a good reputation.
The text you are quoting:
OK, at least with a good reputation.
hayes, Sep 11, 2008 @ 00:39
hayes, Sep 11, 2008 @ 00:39
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: ??? Past life regression hypnotist (Geneva) ???
Post 2
Sep 11, 2008 @ 00:48
I only know someone who just took a regression course from brian weiss. not a doc, tho.
The text you are quoting:
I only know someone who just took a regression course from brian weiss. not a doc, tho.
nichole, Sep 11, 2008 @ 00:48
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: ??? Past life regression hypnotist (Geneva) ???
Post 3
Sep 11, 2008 @ 02:00
[font=Comic Sans MS]I'd be totally interested too.... keep me updated!!!!!!! Also if anyone knows of any 'authentic' mediums or faith healers. Thanks in advance!![size=5][/size][/font]
The text you are quoting:
[font=Comic Sans MS]I'd be totally interested too.... keep me updated!!!!!!! Also if anyone knows of any 'authentic' mediums or faith healers. Thanks in advance!![size=5][/size][/font]
speedbunny, Sep 11, 2008 @ 02:00
speedbunny, Sep 11, 2008 @ 02:00
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: ??? Past life regression hypnotist (Geneva) ???
Post 4
Sep 11, 2008 @ 13:32
Hi Hayes,
Shouldn't you be packing your bags for your trip?
Anyhow, a little Google work. Here is a link you might want to look at.
http://www.regressionacademy.com/therapists/tatjana-kuchler.htm
Shouldn't you be packing your bags for your trip?
Anyhow, a little Google work. Here is a link you might want to look at.
http://www.regressionacademy.com/therapists/tatjana-kuchler.htm
Let us know if you were someone important:D
Good luck,
Verbier
The text you are quoting:
Hi Hayes,
Shouldn't you be packing your bags for your trip?
Anyhow, a little Google work. Here is a link you might want to look at.
http://www.regressionacademy.com/therapists/tatjana-kuchler.htm
Shouldn't you be packing your bags for your trip?
Anyhow, a little Google work. Here is a link you might want to look at.
http://www.regressionacademy.com/therapists/tatjana-kuchler.htm
Let us know if you were someone important:D
Good luck,
Verbier
Verbier, Sep 11, 2008 @ 13:32
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: ??? Past life regression hypnotist (Geneva) ???
Post 5
Sep 11, 2008 @ 13:53
@Whovian: Thanks for the concern -- you're not the only one to say that. I'm totally in the research phase and I'm not going blindly into anything. Whenever it may have been. I'm careful.
@Verbier: not quite packing time yet. But thanks for the information. She's interesting. The doubling time for the global population is what, about 30 years or something? So assuming an exponential growth, I'd only have to go back a few generations to come to an epoch where the population is orders of magnitude smaller. Thus the chances of being one of the important ones becomes much higher. See? I'm hoping for Jesus, but I'd settle for Moses. That said, I could have been both.
( The major assumption, that the number of important people somehow falls faster than the total, may be flawed. )
@Verbier: not quite packing time yet. But thanks for the information. She's interesting. The doubling time for the global population is what, about 30 years or something? So assuming an exponential growth, I'd only have to go back a few generations to come to an epoch where the population is orders of magnitude smaller. Thus the chances of being one of the important ones becomes much higher. See? I'm hoping for Jesus, but I'd settle for Moses. That said, I could have been both.
( The major assumption, that the number of important people somehow falls faster than the total, may be flawed. )
The text you are quoting:
@Whovian: Thanks for the concern -- you're not the only one to say that. I'm totally in the research phase and I'm not going blindly into anything. Whenever it may have been. I'm careful.
@Verbier: not quite packing time yet. But thanks for the information. She's interesting. The doubling time for the global population is what, about 30 years or something? So assuming an exponential growth, I'd only have to go back a few generations to come to an epoch where the population is orders of magnitude smaller. Thus the chances of being one of the important ones becomes much higher. See? I'm hoping for Jesus, but I'd settle for Moses. That said, I could have been both.
( The major assumption, that the number of important people somehow falls faster than the total, may be flawed. )
hayes, Sep 11, 2008 @ 13:53
@Verbier: not quite packing time yet. But thanks for the information. She's interesting. The doubling time for the global population is what, about 30 years or something? So assuming an exponential growth, I'd only have to go back a few generations to come to an epoch where the population is orders of magnitude smaller. Thus the chances of being one of the important ones becomes much higher. See? I'm hoping for Jesus, but I'd settle for Moses. That said, I could have been both.
( The major assumption, that the number of important people somehow falls faster than the total, may be flawed. )
hayes, Sep 11, 2008 @ 13:53
Your Reply:
