Ron Paul - one of the good guys...lightyears better than Obama

He's the only republican candidate that seems to have common sense, and therefore probably the best choice. I don't like his stance on adoption (pro-life) though.

Obama hasn't delivered and turned out to be a disappointment. I'd still prefer his 2nd term over a republican though, hopefully with support of the house (in 2014 I think) so he has a chance.

Ron Paul is the only one that offers a true alternative, he is the kind of politician that could lead us out of this mess. REVOLUTION :)

I agree and he will have my vote.

Read and watch a bit more about your preferred candidate...

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/wrong-paul/

See Ron Paul and Stormfront

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html

Thank you for the three and four year old information.

I'm voting for Paul because of his fiscal policy and his desire to end the wars that America has waged across the globe. Obama is a dismal failure who has escalated the wars, failed to keep his promises and is responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people around the world. He has extended the Patriot Act and failed to condemn the police state that is cracking heads in the US. The Republicans other than Paul are even worse. 

4 years of Paul over that schill Obama ( who I voted for) anyday.

Voting Peace

No one said Ron Paul was perfect, but at least he has the balls to say  what will happen even if it is not what people want to hear. Obama lied in the face of millions and brought the US on the brink of collapse, he is a total failure. I am not American. BUt I wish we had people like him in Europe. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKBlk1Vpeuw

Some four year old info that answers some questions

NOBAMA, with all his friends from Goldman Sachs  he is in the same mafia as lots of politicians

1) Voting for Ron Paul will elect the main Republican candidate...

2)  As for how "old" information is, well in politics, it's called a "record" whether it's a specific voting record or a general political one.

3) One can ignore facts but that doesn't make them irrelevant or untrue....

a) "Ron Paul Invites Neo-Confederates to Congressional Hearing (2011)"

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/02/09/ron-paul-invites-witness-with-neo-confederate-ties-to-testify-in-congress/

b) Against civil rights:

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/161217-paul-says-he-would-have-opposed-civil-rights-act

c) Consistently against abortion rights legislation:

http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/2012/gop-presidential-candidates/ron-paul.html

d) Against gay marriage :http://www.hrc.org/issues/pages/gop-presidential-contenders

What does that clip answer? Nothing.

1) he says he didn't write or read those newsletters that were put out for years and years under his name.

One has to be incredibly politically naive to believe that. 

Ron Paul is the biggest supporter of Liberty, and if you vote for the candidate just because they are for gay marriage and abortion it is in my view pretty sad. There are issues much more important on which he is the only one bringing a solution, all other are the same promissing things to be elected. By wanting to audit the fed get rid of useless departments would actually bring back liberty and civil rights, reducing the size of the government would also increase freedom. I do not agree with you on racism, wanting peace with Iran and just make business and be friends with everyone is pure racism.

Always happy to debate :) makes the world move

Please watch the video again before you call anyone politically naive. You seem to completely ignore the most important aspects.

1) Between 3:00 & 3:15, Ron Paul talks numbers - 14% & 67% and makes an important point - that's the judicial code he's attacking and thus, he ain't racist.

I don't understand it, but he uses words such as judicial code. Plus, he can count upto 67. 

2) He specifies that he didn't read what he wrote. He didn't even write what he wrote. 

He's great at outsourcing.

3) He doesn't even know who wrote it. It ain't classified information, nor does it require an apology to anyone.

He's accountable. But you can't blame him for stuff he doesn't know. In fact, it ain't even him in the video, it's probably Sacha Baron Cohen.

Gosh darnit, when will teh guvmint finally learn to keep its filthy hands off my polio, my mercury poisoning and my deposits with failed regional banks.