Hey guys.
What do you think about us adding a persons Last Login date (without an exact date, just a range), on his/her profile?
This means that when you see a profile, you will see something like:
Last Login: Past week / past 2 weeks / past month / past 3 months / more than 3 months ago
What think?
Oded
Global Forums > News from the Site Admin > What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Only members can see names and photos
What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Apr 2, 2007 @ 16:26
The text you are quoting:
Hey guys.
What do you think about us adding a persons Last Login date (without an exact date, just a range), on his/her profile?
This means that when you see a profile, you will see something like:
Last Login: Past week / past 2 weeks / past month / past 3 months / more than 3 months ago
What think?
Oded
SiteAdmin OdedApr 2, 2007 @ 16:26
What do you think about us adding a persons Last Login date (without an exact date, just a range), on his/her profile?
This means that when you see a profile, you will see something like:
Last Login: Past week / past 2 weeks / past month / past 3 months / more than 3 months ago
What think?
Oded
SiteAdmin OdedApr 2, 2007 @ 16:26
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 1
Apr 3, 2007 @ 01:07
Not only we'd be able to see if the person was active or relatively active, we'd also be able to see if the person had just put up a profile for amusement on a dull and dreary rainy day (as I've already mentioned in past forums) - and then, Oded could knock them out after a certain lapse of time! Way to go! Cheers! :-) J.
The text you are quoting:
Not only we'd be able to see if the person was active or relatively active, we'd also be able to see if the person had just put up a profile for amusement on a dull and dreary rainy day (as I've already mentioned in past forums) - and then, Oded could knock them out after a certain lapse of time! Way to go! Cheers! :-) J.
JulianT, Apr 3, 2007 @ 01:07
JulianT, Apr 3, 2007 @ 01:07
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 2
Apr 3, 2007 @ 11:54
so we can see when ppl logged in last time, if they are still active, if they have decided not to be active anymore ...
sounds a cool idea to me :)
sounds a cool idea to me :)
The text you are quoting:
so we can see when ppl logged in last time, if they are still active, if they have decided not to be active anymore ...
sounds a cool idea to me :)
Hoiling, Apr 3, 2007 @ 11:54
sounds a cool idea to me :)
Hoiling, Apr 3, 2007 @ 11:54
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 3
Apr 3, 2007 @ 12:37
A "last log-in date range" is a great idea. Other networking sites (e.g. MySpace) do something similar, yet they put the exact date on your profile page. Prefer the GoL idea of the "range" rather than the exact date....either way, I think it is a positive step forwards.
The text you are quoting:
A "last log-in date range" is a great idea. Other networking sites (e.g. MySpace) do something similar, yet they put the exact date on your profile page. Prefer the GoL idea of the "range" rather than the exact date....either way, I think it is a positive step forwards.
phil, Apr 3, 2007 @ 12:37
phil, Apr 3, 2007 @ 12:37
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 4
Apr 3, 2007 @ 19:49
"member since" ..., as it goes more or less in the same category, knowing if people are active or not.
Remy
Remy
The text you are quoting:
"member since" ..., as it goes more or less in the same category, knowing if people are active or not.
Remy
RemyS, Apr 3, 2007 @ 19:49
Remy
RemyS, Apr 3, 2007 @ 19:49
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 5
Apr 3, 2007 @ 20:42
It's not so usefull as long as we know that most members are active ones. Which is the reason why I really like the idea of an "away button" for heavy travellers, ONG field professionals or people in rehab for instance. I also like the idea of having an email sent to members who didn't logged in for 2 months (4 weeks can be just holidays) asking them to renew / cancel their membership.
The text you are quoting:
It's not so usefull as long as we know that most members are active ones. Which is the reason why I really like the idea of an "away button" for heavy travellers, ONG field professionals or people in rehab for instance. I also like the idea of having an email sent to members who didn't logged in for 2 months (4 weeks can be just holidays) asking them to renew / cancel their membership.
Hobbes, Apr 3, 2007 @ 20:42
Hobbes, Apr 3, 2007 @ 20:42
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 6
Apr 4, 2007 @ 18:52
member since is a great idea
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 7
Apr 5, 2007 @ 23:50
made me smile Hobbes. Good on you...(-:
The text you are quoting:
made me smile Hobbes. Good on you...(-:
Nir Ofek, Apr 5, 2007 @ 23:50
Nir Ofek, Apr 5, 2007 @ 23:50
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 8
Apr 14, 2007 @ 12:10
How about also adding to the profile since when people are members?
The text you are quoting:
How about also adding to the profile since when people are members?
Carol A, Apr 14, 2007 @ 12:10
Carol A, Apr 14, 2007 @ 12:10
Your Reply:
Only members can see names and photos
Re: What about "Last Logged in Date range" on profiles?
Post 9
Apr 19, 2007 @ 14:42
Thanks to all those who took the time to share feedback. It seems the idea will be useful, so we'll make it happen in one of the next upgrade rounds.
The text you are quoting:
Thanks to all those who took the time to share feedback. It seems the idea will be useful, so we'll make it happen in one of the next upgrade rounds.
Nir Ofek, Apr 19, 2007 @ 14:42
Nir Ofek, Apr 19, 2007 @ 14:42
Your Reply:
