http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,829218,00.html
I refute this article. It intends to browbeat the current Maharaja while he has clearly succeeded in creating the intended rifts & polarising opinions in the population that speaks...one language?
I refute this article. It intends to browbeat the current Maharaja while he has clearly succeeded in creating the intended rifts & polarising opinions in the population that speaks...one language?
Arun K V, Apr 25, 2012 @ 09:01
An election where a significant part of the population are able to align with a candidate is not a blemish but a win for democracy.
It doesn't matter how much you hate a candidate, others don't one vote for him (her)... that's democracy.
An election where a significant part of the population are able to align with a candidate is not a blemish but a win for democracy.
It doesn't matter how much you hate a candidate, others don't one vote for him (her)... that's democracy.
Leo F, Apr 26, 2012 @ 14:36
An election where a significant part of the population are able to align with a candidate is not a blemish but a win for democracy.
It doesn't matter how much you hate a candidate, others don't one vote for him (her)... that's democracy.
Apr 26, 12 14:36
You're right...in its current format it sure is a win for democracy! In essence though, does it truly allow all 'qualified' citizens of the state to determine public policy, laws & acts by the state?
For example, a Like button alone sans a Hate button may not entirely reflect public opinion?
You're right...in its current format it sure is a win for democracy! In essence though, does it truly allow all 'qualified' citizens of the state to determine public policy, laws & acts by the state?
For example, a Like button alone sans a Hate button may not entirely reflect public opinion?
Arun K V, Apr 26, 2012 @ 14:53